[20200512]LSB10462_“背信弃义的选民”向最高法院提出质疑.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:29278 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2020-05-12 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:628.91KB
下载 相关 举报
[20200512]LSB10462_“背信弃义的选民”向最高法院提出质疑.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20200512]LSB10462_“背信弃义的选民”向最高法院提出质疑.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20200512]LSB10462_“背信弃义的选民”向最高法院提出质疑.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20200512]LSB10462_“背信弃义的选民”向最高法院提出质疑.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20200512]LSB10462_“背信弃义的选民”向最高法院提出质疑.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i “Faithless Elector” Challenge Goes to Supreme Court May 12, 2020 On May 13, 2020, the Supreme Court is set to hear two cases, Chiafalo v. Washington and Colorado Department of State v. Baca, that could de

2、termine how much power states have to control the presidential selection process in the Electoral College. As a formal matter, the Constitution provides that state legislatures shall direct the appointment of presidential electors, who, in turn, cast ballots for President and Vice President. But in

3、practice, every state legislature has determined that electors should follow the will of their states voters. The question in these cases is whether states may require electors to cast ballots for the presidential ticket favored by their voters, or whether electors retain the ultimate discretion to

4、cast ballots for the candidates of their choice. Factual Background So-called “faithless electors” (or “anomalous electors”)electors who cast ballots for a candidate other than the one expected by their states legislaturehave existed since early American history, though they have never tipped the ou

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告