[20200602]LSB10485_这不是通用的吗:最高法院将考虑使用通用术语的网址是否可以注册商标.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:29384 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2020-06-03 格式:PDF 页数:4 大小:636KB
下载 相关 举报
[20200602]LSB10485_这不是通用的吗:最高法院将考虑使用通用术语的网址是否可以注册商标.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
[20200602]LSB10485_这不是通用的吗:最高法院将考虑使用通用术语的网址是否可以注册商标.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
[20200602]LSB10485_这不是通用的吗:最高法院将考虑使用通用术语的网址是否可以注册商标.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共4页
[20200602]LSB10485_这不是通用的吗:最高法院将考虑使用通用术语的网址是否可以注册商标.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共4页
亲,该文档总共4页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Isnt It Generic: Supreme Court to Consider Whether Web Addresses Using Generic Terms May Be Trademarked June 2, 2020 What can be trademarked? On May 4, 2020, in its first telephonic oral argument ever, th

2、e Supreme Court heard arguments addressing this question. Generally, trademarks protect the goodwill that a company has built in a “distinctive” name or mark. Whether a mark is distinctive can depend on a number of factors, but, under long-standing trademark principles, a “generic” mark is never dis

3、tinctive and therefore may not be protected under trademark law. A mark is generic if it is the “common name of a product” or “the genus of which the particular product is a species.” For example, one could not trademark the name “LITE BEER for light beer, or CONVENIENT STORE for convenience stores.

4、” B, a hotel reservation company, applied to the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) for a trademark on its business name, BOOKING.COM. The PTO denied the application, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (Fourth Circuit) held that BOOKING.COM is a protectable mark. In PTO v. B, the

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告