[20200617]LSB10496_最高法院规则第七章禁止歧视同性恋和变性员工:潜在影响.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:29433 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2020-06-17 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:787.89KB
下载 相关 举报
[20200617]LSB10496_最高法院规则第七章禁止歧视同性恋和变性员工:潜在影响.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20200617]LSB10496_最高法院规则第七章禁止歧视同性恋和变性员工:潜在影响.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20200617]LSB10496_最高法院规则第七章禁止歧视同性恋和变性员工:潜在影响.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20200617]LSB10496_最高法院规则第七章禁止歧视同性恋和变性员工:潜在影响.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20200617]LSB10496_最高法院规则第七章禁止歧视同性恋和变性员工:潜在影响.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Supreme Court Rules Title VII Bars Discrimination Against Gay and Transgender Employees: Potential Implications June 17, 2020 On June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court issued a decision in a series of cases bro

2、ught by gay and transgender workers alleging that their employers violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) by discriminating against them “because of . . . sex.” The Court held 6-3 in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia that Title VII forbids employers from firing an individual

3、for being gay or transgender. The Courts decision in Bostock was consolidated with two other cases, Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. EEOC. (An earlier Sidebar addresses lower court decisions in these cases and provides further background on Title VII.) Th

4、is Sidebar explains the Courts holding in Bostock and highlights some potential implications of the decision for other areas of the law, including the “bona fide occupational qualification” (BFOQ) exception in Title VII; constitutional exceptions and religious-based exemptions to Title VII; various

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告