[20200702]LSB10509_最高法院裁定将宗教学校排除在援助计划之外违反了宪法:对国会的影响 .pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:29500 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2020-07-02 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:660.22KB
下载 相关 举报
[20200702]LSB10509_最高法院裁定将宗教学校排除在援助计划之外违反了宪法:对国会的影响 .pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20200702]LSB10509_最高法院裁定将宗教学校排除在援助计划之外违反了宪法:对国会的影响 .pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20200702]LSB10509_最高法院裁定将宗教学校排除在援助计划之外违反了宪法:对国会的影响 .pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20200702]LSB10509_最高法院裁定将宗教学校排除在援助计划之外违反了宪法:对国会的影响 .pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20200702]LSB10509_最高法院裁定将宗教学校排除在援助计划之外违反了宪法:对国会的影响 .pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Supreme Court Rules That Excluding Religious Schools from Aid Program Violates Constitution: Implications for Congress July 2, 2020 Based on concerns about impermissibly supporting religion, many state co

2、nstitutions bar state governments from providing funds to churches and other types of religious institutionseven in circumstances where that support would not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. However, in recent years, some have questioned whether thes

3、e state provisions are unconstitutional under Supreme Court precedent that has interpreted the First Amendments Free Exercise Clause to prevent governments from discriminating against religious organizations when they distribute public benefits. In Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, issued J

4、une 30, 2020, the Supreme Court weighed in on this question, ruling that Montanas state constitution could not be applied to bar religious schools from participating in a tax credit program benefiting parents of private school students. This Legal Sidebar discusses the legal principles that governed

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告