[20200706]LSB10510_最高法院支持对快速遣送的有限审查.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:29508 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2020-07-06 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:664.75KB
下载 相关 举报
[20200706]LSB10510_最高法院支持对快速遣送的有限审查.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20200706]LSB10510_最高法院支持对快速遣送的有限审查.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20200706]LSB10510_最高法院支持对快速遣送的有限审查.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20200706]LSB10510_最高法院支持对快速遣送的有限审查.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20200706]LSB10510_最高法院支持对快速遣送的有限审查.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Supreme Court Upholds Limited Review of Expedited Removal July 6, 2020 Certain non-U.S. nationals (aliens) who lack authorization to enter the United States are subject to a streamlined “expedited removal

2、” process, which affords fewer procedural protections to the alien than standard removal proceedings and typically results in the quicker expulsion of the alien from the United States. Federal statute also precludes judicial review of an expedited removal order except in limited circumstances, inclu

3、ding habeas corpus proceedings concerning whether the alien is lawfully detained. But habeas review is limited to three narrow grounds, and does not include review of threshold determinations about asylum eligibility or any other aspect of the merits of the underlying expedited removal proceedings.

4、In DHS v. Thuraissigiam, the Supreme Court considered whether these statutory limitations violate the Suspension Clause, which normally forbids the government from restricting an individuals ability to contest his or her detention in a habeas action. The Court held that the statutes restrictions on

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告