[20210205]LSB10563_最高法院两起案件测试对大屠杀损害外国主权豁免的限制.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:30270 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2021-02-08 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:695.28KB
下载 相关 举报
[20210205]LSB10563_最高法院两起案件测试对大屠杀损害外国主权豁免的限制.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20210205]LSB10563_最高法院两起案件测试对大屠杀损害外国主权豁免的限制.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20210205]LSB10563_最高法院两起案件测试对大屠杀损害外国主权豁免的限制.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20210205]LSB10563_最高法院两起案件测试对大屠杀损害外国主权豁免的限制.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20210205]LSB10563_最高法院两起案件测试对大屠杀损害外国主权豁免的限制.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Two Supreme Court Cases to Test Limits on Foreign Sovereign Immunity for Holocaust Harms Updated February 5, 2021 UPDATE: On February 3, 2021, the Supreme Court issued unanimous opinions in Germany and Hu

2、ngary, holding that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) does not permit claims against foreign governments for “taking” property from their own citizens, even if the taking occurred as part of a genocide or other human rights violation. The Court agreed with Germany that the FSIAs expropriat

3、ion exception incorporated the international law of propertywhich excludes purely domestic takings. The Court reasoned that the domestic takings rule does not implicate the law of genocide or human rights, and, as such, the expropriation exception does not apply. The Court did not address the comity

4、 question, nor did it address the factual dispute over whether an act of genocide took place. Instead, the Court remanded this case, as well as the Hungary case, for further proceedings consistent with its FSIA holding. The original post from December 16, 2020, is below. In two cases this term, Repu

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告