[20210317]LSB10387_在边境对电子设备进行无担保搜查是否违反了第四修正案?.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:30469 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2021-03-17 格式:PDF 页数:7 大小:712.05KB
下载 相关 举报
[20210317]LSB10387_在边境对电子设备进行无担保搜查是否违反了第四修正案?.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共7页
[20210317]LSB10387_在边境对电子设备进行无担保搜查是否违反了第四修正案?.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共7页
[20210317]LSB10387_在边境对电子设备进行无担保搜查是否违反了第四修正案?.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共7页
[20210317]LSB10387_在边境对电子设备进行无担保搜查是否违反了第四修正案?.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共7页
[20210317]LSB10387_在边境对电子设备进行无担保搜查是否违反了第四修正案?.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共7页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Do Warrantless Searches of Electronic Devices at the Border Violate the Fourth Amendment? Updated March 17, 2021 The Fourth Amendment commands that searches and seizures be reasonable, and generally requi

2、res the government to secure a warrant based on probable cause before arresting or searching an individual. But the Supreme Court has long recognized that the government may conduct routine inspections and searches of individuals entering at the U.S. border without a warrant or any individualized su

3、spicion of criminal activity. In recent decades, some federal courts have applied the “border search exception” to allow relatively limited, manual searches at the border of electronic devices such as computers and cell phones. Courts, however, have disagreed over whether more intrusive, forensic ex

4、aminations of such devices require heightened suspicion of criminal activity. Recently in Alasaad v. Mayorkas, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit overturned a federal district courts ruling that any “non-cursory” border search of an electronic devicewhether conducted manually or forensi

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告