[20210401]LSB10552_托雷斯诉马德里:警察使用武力、第四修正案扣押和逃犯.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:30529 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2021-04-01 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:717.23KB
下载 相关 举报
[20210401]LSB10552_托雷斯诉马德里:警察使用武力、第四修正案扣押和逃犯.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20210401]LSB10552_托雷斯诉马德里:警察使用武力、第四修正案扣押和逃犯.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20210401]LSB10552_托雷斯诉马德里:警察使用武力、第四修正案扣押和逃犯.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20210401]LSB10552_托雷斯诉马德里:警察使用武力、第四修正案扣押和逃犯.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20210401]LSB10552_托雷斯诉马德里:警察使用武力、第四修正案扣押和逃犯.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Torres v. Madrid: Police Use of Force, Fourth Amendment Seizures, and Fleeing Suspects Updated April 1, 2021 UPDATE: On March 25, 2021 the Supreme Court held in a 5-to-3 decision in Torres v. Madrid that

2、the “application of physical force to the body of a person with intent to restrain is a seizure” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, “even if the force does not succeed in subduing the person.” In an opinion authored by Chief Justice Roberts and joined by Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, a

3、nd Kavanaugh, the majority, looking to the historical definition of seizure and its present-day legal meaning, concluded that “seizure of a person plainly refers to an arrest.” In addition, the majority determined that historically, an arrest could occur even through mere touch“the slightest applica

4、tion of force” such as by the “laying of hands”and even where the arrestee escaped. Although, the majority acknowledged that Torres arose from “a shooting” rather than the laying of hands on a suspect, it declined to “draw an artificial line between grasping with a hand and other means of applying p

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告