1、1 298 F.3d 814 (9th Cir. 2002), cert. granted, 123 S. Ct. 1253 (Feb. 24, 2003) (No. 02-658).2 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.3 309 F.3d 550 (9th Cir. 2002), cert. granted, 123 S. Ct. 2274 (June 9, 2003) (No. 02-1343).4 It is the absence of such a federalism theme that leads us not to include in this report a
2、third caseinvolving a federal environmental statute that recently was accepted by the Court. In SouthFlorida Water Mgmt. Dist. v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, 280 F.3d 1364 (11th Cir. 2002), cert.granted, 71 U.S.L.W. 3798 (June 27, 2003) (No. 02-626), the question presented is whether(continued.)Con
3、gressional Research Service The Library of CongressCRS Report for CongressReceived through the CRS WebOrder Code RS21580July 28, 2003Federal/State Relations Under the Clean AirAct: The Supreme Court Takes Two Casesname redactedLegislative AttorneyAmerican Law DivisionSummaryRecently, the Supreme Cou
4、rt agreed to hear two cases involving federalism issuesunder the Clean Air Act (CAA). In Alaska Dept of Environmental Conservation v.EPA, the Court will wrestle with whether EPA can enforce a Prevention of SignificantDeterioration (PSD) provision in the CAA contrary to a prior state determination un
升级VIP 