[20180420]LSB10061_更新日期:最高法院同意听取SEC行政法法官的宪法质疑.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:27211 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-04-09 格式:PDF 页数:4 大小:743.52KB
下载 相关 举报
[20180420]LSB10061_更新日期:最高法院同意听取SEC行政法法官的宪法质疑.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
[20180420]LSB10061_更新日期:最高法院同意听取SEC行政法法官的宪法质疑.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
[20180420]LSB10061_更新日期:最高法院同意听取SEC行政法法官的宪法质疑.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共4页
[20180420]LSB10061_更新日期:最高法院同意听取SEC行政法法官的宪法质疑.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共4页
亲,该文档总共4页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i UPDATED: Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Constitutional Challenge to SEC Administrative Law Judges Updated April 20, 2018 UPDATE 4/20/2018: The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Lucia v. SEC on Monday, Apri

2、l 23, 2018. The original post from January 16, 2018, follows below. On Friday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to decide whether administrative law judges (ALJs) within the SEC are “Officers of the United States” (officers) who must be appoin

3、ted in accordance with the Appointments Clause of Article II of the Constitution. If the Supreme Court holds that SEC ALJs are officers, its conclusion could call into question the validity of prior decisions rendered by SEC ALJs (whose initial hiring did not comport with the Appointments Clause) an

4、d may have broader implications for ALJs in other federal agencies. This Sidebar provides an overview of the case by first discussing the Appointments Clause and the key decisions leading up to the Courts review, and then highlighting the relevant arguments and considerations before the Supreme Cour

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告