[20191011]LSB10352_最高法院审议同性恋和变性工作者的性别歧视指控.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:28581 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-10-11 格式:PDF 页数:5 大小:676.34KB
下载 相关 举报
[20191011]LSB10352_最高法院审议同性恋和变性工作者的性别歧视指控.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
[20191011]LSB10352_最高法院审议同性恋和变性工作者的性别歧视指控.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
[20191011]LSB10352_最高法院审议同性恋和变性工作者的性别歧视指控.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
[20191011]LSB10352_最高法院审议同性恋和变性工作者的性别歧视指控.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
[20191011]LSB10352_最高法院审议同性恋和变性工作者的性别歧视指控.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Supreme Court Considers Sex Discrimination Claims by Gay and Transgender Workers October 11, 2019 On October 8, 2019, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda, Bostock v. C

2、layton County, Georgia, and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. (Harris Homes) v. EEOC, a trio of cases in which the Court is considering for the first time whether the prohibition of employment discrimination “because of . . . sex” in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) encompa

3、sses discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. This Sidebar provides an overview of Altitude Express, Bostock, and Harris Homes for Congress. The Sidebar first outlines select Supreme Court precedent interpreting Title VIIs prohibition on sex-based discrimination, then summarize

4、s the facts and arguments in the current cases. The Sidebar concludes by discussing the potential implications of the cases, including key considerations for Congress. Title VII and Discrimination Because of Sex Title VII provides in relevant part that it is “an unlawful employment practice” for an

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告