[20010227]RS20828_阿拉巴马大学诉加勒特:联邦制对《美国残疾人法案》的限制.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:15678 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2001-02-27 格式:PDF 页数:7 大小:57.88KB
下载 相关 举报
[20010227]RS20828_阿拉巴马大学诉加勒特:联邦制对《美国残疾人法案》的限制.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共7页
[20010227]RS20828_阿拉巴马大学诉加勒特:联邦制对《美国残疾人法案》的限制.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共7页
[20010227]RS20828_阿拉巴马大学诉加勒特:联邦制对《美国残疾人法案》的限制.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共7页
[20010227]RS20828_阿拉巴马大学诉加勒特:联邦制对《美国残疾人法案》的限制.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共7页
[20010227]RS20828_阿拉巴马大学诉加勒特:联邦制对《美国残疾人法案》的限制.pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共7页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

1、1 505 U.S. 144 (1992).2 Curt A. Levey, “The Quiet Revolution Conservatives Continue Federalism Resurgence byExpanding State Immunity,” 157 N.J.L.J. 707 (August 23, 1999). See also Thomas, “Federalismand the Constitution: Limits on Congressional Power,” CRS Rep. No. 30315.3 Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 7

2、06 (1999)(Congress lacks the authority when exercising Article Ipowers to subject non-consenting states to private suits for damages in state courts); CollegeSavings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Educ. Expense Bd., 527 U. S.666 (1999) (TheTrademark Remedy Clarification Act, TRCA, which subje

3、cted states to suit for false andmisleading advertising, did not validly abrogate state sovereign immunity; neither the right to befree from a business competitors false advertising nor a more generalized right to be secure in(continued.)Congressional Research Service ? The Library of CongressCRS Re

4、port for CongressReceived through the CRS WebOrder Code RS20828February 27, 2001University of Alabama v. Garrett: FederalismLimits on the Americans with Disabilities Act name redactedLegislative AttorneyAmerican Law DivisionSummaryOn Feb. 21, 2001, the Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision, held that the

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告