[20180329]LSB10107_澄清“胡言乱语”:最高法院认为州法院可以审理证券法诉讼.pdf

上传人:任我行 文档编号:27149 上传时间:2022-06-24 发布时间:2019-04-12 格式:PDF 页数:4 大小:623.01KB
下载 相关 举报
[20180329]LSB10107_澄清“胡言乱语”:最高法院认为州法院可以审理证券法诉讼.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共4页
[20180329]LSB10107_澄清“胡言乱语”:最高法院认为州法院可以审理证券法诉讼.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共4页
[20180329]LSB10107_澄清“胡言乱语”:最高法院认为州法院可以审理证券法诉讼.pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共4页
[20180329]LSB10107_澄清“胡言乱语”:最高法院认为州法院可以审理证券法诉讼.pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共4页
亲,该文档总共4页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Clarifying “Gibberish”: Supreme Court Holds That State Courts Can Hear Securities Act Lawsuits March 29, 2018 On March 20, in a case watched closely by the securities bar, the Supreme Court addressed the implic

2、ations of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (SLUSA)a statute that Justices Alito and Gorsuch described during oral argument as “gibberish.” In Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, the Court unanimously held in a decision by Justice Kagan that SLUSA does not (1

3、) strip state courts of jurisdiction over class actions alleging violations of only the Securities Act of 1933 (the 1933 Act), or (2) allow defendants to remove such actions from state court to federal court. This Sidebar discusses the cases background, the Courts decision, and the decisions implica

4、tions for securities litigation. Background The details of Cyan and the circuit split that preceded the Courts decision are discussed in a prior Sidebar. In short, the 1933 Actwhich principally regulates initial offerings of securitiesprovides a cause of action against an issuer of securities and ce

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 法规条令 > CRS 美国国会研究处报告